Accessible by choice, not just by obligation.
This project aims to be usable across different devices, abilities and levels of familiarity with Swedish systems. It borrows the core accessibility principles used in Sweden’s public-sector guidance: content should be perceivable, operable, understandable and robust.
This page is a voluntary accessibility note, not a claim that the project is a public authority or a formally audited statutory accessibility statement.
Design targets
- semantic headings and landmarks;
- keyboard-accessible controls and visible focus;
- reasonable colour contrast;
- usable browser zoom and responsive layouts;
- no essential information communicated by colour alone;
- support for prefers-reduced-motion;
- plain language and explanations of Swedish terminology;
- no autoplaying audio;
- labels for interactive controls and meaningful links.
The practical target is to follow WCAG good practice, ideally around WCAG 2.2 AA where feasible, without pretending the site has undergone a formal accessibility audit.
Known limitations
- External authority websites, PDF documents and audio are outside this project’s control.
- Some official source material can be dense even when the project’s explanation is simpler.
- New features may occasionally introduce accessibility regressions before they are noticed.
- The project cannot test every browser, assistive technology or device.
Tell me what failed
An accessibility report is more useful than a generic “this site is inaccessible”. If possible, include the page, what you tried to do, browser/device or assistive technology, and what happened.
No formal response time can be promised, but barriers that prevent access to core information are treated as high-priority fixes.